The Mandala Herr Roth hat Frau Weiss geheiratet ("Mr. Red has married Mrs. White") was painted while I was in a very deep life crisis in 1974. It is composed of 9 x 11 (!) red and 9 x 11 white elements plus the empty center. For me it is a symbol of the union of the opposites and of the unus mundus (Carl Jung) or of the unified psychophysical reality (Wolfgang Pauli) out of which a new creation is born. I was very shocked when I realized that it contains the symbolism of 9/11...! In my interpretation it symbolizes a positive compensation to that event.

Remo F. Roth

Dr. oec. publ., Ph.D.

dipl. analyt. Psychologe (M.-L. v. Franz)


  email

HomePage

WebSite

English HomePage


© 2006 by Marian A. Greenwell


go to index of contents

The Archetype of the Holy Wedding

 in Alchemy and in the Unconscious of Modern Man

 


 

Testimonial

 

January 15, 2006

Dear Dr. Roth,

I discovered your website a few days after Christmas, and was startled at the synchronicity between the conclusions that you draw in your work on the Alchemical Marriage and my lived experience.

In November, 1995, my husband suffered a massive CVA. The bleeding in his brain was so difficult to stop that he was not expected to live. To my surprise and great joy, his condition stabilized, and he "came back." 

He remained paralyzed on the right side, which meant that the cognitive side of his brain was affected. He was unable to speak or to swallow, unable to operate a call button or to use a remote-control device. When I realized that a nursing home could not provide the individual attention that he required, I decided to care for him at home. With therapy, he learned to bear some of his weight in transferring from bed to wheel chair, and although he learned to swallow, he never regained his speech. For ten years, he was trapped, fully conscious, in his own body.

He had been an electrical engineer, a Life Master in Tournament Bridge , an ardent debater of politics, a sports enthusiast, a loving husband and father. He was an extraverted Thinking type. I am a Feeling type.

After the stroke, my husband exhibited qualities that we had never noticed before. There was a "spiritual" dimension in the way he maintained his dignity while submitting to being fed and to having to wear diapers. His sense of humor, expressed by a lop-sided smile and a deep guffaw, endeared him to visitors and caregivers alike. I, as well as others, recognized that in his peaceful –– actually joyful –– acceptance of his condition, he was choosing, day in and day out, to suffer consciously.

Although he had been declining during the past year, my husband died a conscious death. At 4:45 , the morning of October 25, 2005 , he looked deeply into my eyes. I had never seen his eyes look bluer or brighter. Less than an hour later, he simply stopped breathing. It was time. I had grown old and was exhausted; he knew it.

In 2004, I had felt "driven" to write a memoir about my spiritual quest which, years earlier, had led me to connect the psychology of Carl Jung with the Christian myth. When I came upon your work, almost a full year after the publication of my book, I was astonished to find parallels between your writing and mine, although your work is scholarly and scientific while mine is personal and imaginative.

 You begin by noting the eruption of latent heathen German mythology lying beneath Christian mythology. That happens to be the theme of my book [Marian A. Greenwell: Bewitchment and Beyond, see front cover at the right; RFR]. I used the symbol of a bewitched bear, from the fairy tale, "Snow-white and Rose-red," [Grimm Brothers' collection] to represent Christ's Anima, His Mystical Body–– the Catholic Church –– which I perceive as being in a state of "bewitchment." I had no previous knowledge of such an image, and thought that I had just "made it up." Shortly after Christmas, 2005, I chanced upon a reference noting that Nicholas von Flue had received a vision of Christ in a bearskin. Research of the topic led to links with your website.

In 2004, while I was reflecting and writing on the meaning and significance of conscious suffering and its transformative effect on our lives, I received an e-mail newsletter containing an essay by Teilhard de Chardin describing the mystical potential of conscious suffering. [Human Energy] Now, eighteen months later, I discover your psychological perspective. Coming upon it so soon after my husband's death suggests to me a connection with his subtle body, affirming my insight as well as your conclusions.

On a different note, I do admit to getting lost, sometimes, in the complexities of your texts because I do not have a truly scientific mind. However, when understanding does manage to break through, the illumination is brilliant––for example, your thoughts on the subtle body. I am still unable, however, to grasp your passing observation in the "Introduction": that the principle of synchronicity now "takes the place of the Christian God." I can imagine synchronicity as a manifestation of God –– or of the Spirit –– or as transforming the God-Image –– but do not understand it as replacing God. Another thought that eludes me is your reference to the human body as "evil matter." [Section 20; p. 7] I understand the body as being matter evolving toward transformation, or as housing the Unconscious, but not as "evil." I have always been filled with wonder at the resilience and awesome capabilities of human physiology. I think of my body as my soul's best friend on earth, offering a life-time of hospitality.

Thank you for sharing your work so generously. I have invited a few like-minded friends to study your pages with me. It is time to do whatever we can to awaken from Freudian-Newtonian anesthesia and to question the mechanical behavior to which we have succumbed. Please continue to rattle our cages.

Sincerely

Marian

****** 

Remarks RFR:

Marian,

With "the human body as evil matter" I do not talk of my opinion which is exactly the contrary. I only quote the Neoplatonic and thus Christian (and Jungian) view of the body. 

Perhaps my formulation about the Christian God is misleading and I should correct it. I just liked to say that our antropomorphic image of God (that the Father is some sort of an old man, Jesus Christ the puer, and the Holy Ghost a dove) should be replaced by an abstract image, for example the one of Nicholas von Flue (see http://www.psychovision.ch/rfr/radbilde.htm ). Then however, we must -- as I will show in my Holy Wedding -- replace the Trinity by a double Trinity (and not by a quaternity as Jung does). 

Nicholas von Flue's vision of Christ in a bearskin is described and interpreted in Marie-Louise von Franz's book The Visions of Nicholaus von Flue already translated into English but not yet published. Ask http://marie-louisevonfranz.com/ for further informations.                                                                            


 

see also

 

Testimonial 1

 

My Personal Memories of Marie-Louise von Franz

English Homepage Remo F. Roth

back

17.1.2006