4.4
Carl Jung’s divine/human double quaternity versus the Eros
Self and the matter-psyche
4.4.4 Carl Jung’s regressive mergence of the unio
corporalis with the unio
mentalis and the matter-psyche’s principle as the way out
A very interesting aspect of the above quote (see
section
4.4.3) is the fact that it is a spiritual principle, the
differentiated ego, that meets another spiritual principle, the
yet unconscious Self. In the interpretation of Carl Jung the unio
corporalis means thus that a conscious spirit-psyche, the
(Logos) ego, “integrates”, with the help of the feminine
spirit-psyche, parts of the collective unconscious spirit-psyche,
the (Logos) Self. This is of course again a Neoplatonic concept,
in which the body is neglected.
The completely spiritual aspect of Carl
Jung’s interpretation of the unio
corporalis shows especially when he compares it with the unio
mentalis. I will demonstrate this with the help of the
following longer quote. It is taken from the section The
Content and Meaning of the First two Stages, and we realize
that already the title of this section shows that the depth
psychologist does not really distinguish between the two
different phases of Dorneus’ opus:
“[The
alchemists] ‘spirit’ was their own belief in the light – a
spirit which drew the soul to itself from its imprisonment in
the body; but the soul brought with it the darkness of the
chthonic spirit, the unconscious. The separation was so
important because the dark deeds of the soul had to be checked.
The unio mentalis
signified, therefore, an extension of consciousness and the
governance of the soul’s motions by the spirit of truth. But
since the soul made the body to live and was the principle of
all realization, the philosophers could not but see that after
the separation the body and its world were dead. They therefore
called this state the grave, corruption, mortification, and so
on, and the problem then arose of reanimation, that is, of
reuniting the soul with the ‘inanimate’ body.”
As we have seen in section 3.7, in the first coniunctio
the body dies. Thus, the question is about the way the
integration and revitalization of the body, the unio
corporalis, arises. Jung answers it as follows:
“This
raised the question of the way in which the coniunctio could be
effected. Dorn answered this by proposing, instead of an
overcoming of the body, the typical alchemical process of the separatio,
solutio, incineratio, sublimatio, etc. of the red or white
wine, the purpose of this procedure being to produce
a physical equivalent of the substancia coelestis,
recognized by the spirit as the truth and as the image of God
innate in man.” [emphasis mine]
The
substancia coelestis is
an invention of Dorneus and equivalent to the caelum,
the Heaven.
It is the product of the unio
mentalis, and Jung translates its meaning with “the truth”[4],
recognized by the spirit. The method for its “production” is
Active Imagination[5].
It is the God-image in the meaning of Carl Jung, spiritual
indeed, but extended by the addition of the feminine spirit, the
Anima; it is the inner God-image
equivalent to the Self[6],
the quaternity structured in the asymmetry of 3 + 1.
The
caelum, the Heaven,
the product of the unio
mentalis does however not revitalize the body. It is thus
necessary to
produce
a physical equivalent of the substancia
coelestis.
The depth
psychologist tells us that he had already written about this substancia coelestis in his book Psychology and Alchemy, and equates the Heavenly substance with the
archetype of the Anthropos[7]:
“The idea of the Anthropos springs from
the notion of an original state of universal animation, for
which reason the old Masters interpreted their Mercurius as the anima mundi; and just as the original animation could be found in
all matter, so too could the anima
mundi. It was imprinted on all bodies as their raison
d’être, as an image of the demiurge who incarnated in his
own creation and got caught in it.”
Obviously
the depth psychologist is convinced that the anima mundi, the World Soul equivalent to the Anthropos serves the
needs of the physical
equivalent
of the substancia
coelestis, the caelum,
the Heaven. But then he continues:
“Nothing was easier than to identify this
anima mundi with the
Biblical imago Dei,
which represented the truth revealed to the spirit.”
The
Anthropos equivalent with the anima
mundi, the world soul, becomes now the God-image, i.e., the
completely spiritual quaternity of Carl Jung’s Self. This
conclusion is in stark contrast to a postulate of the depth
psychologist four years earlier, in his work AION
(1951)[8]:
“[The lapis]
is the prima materia,
the arcanum, the primary substance, which in Paracelsus and his
followers is called the increatum
and is regarded as coeternal with God – a correct
interpretation of the Tehom in Genesis 1:2: ‘And the [uncreated]
earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face
of the deep; and the Spirit of God [brooded] over the face of
the waters.’ This primary substance is round (massa
globosa, rotundum, stoicheion
strongylon)
like the world and the world-soul; it is in fact the world-soul
and the world-substance in one.” [emphasis mine]
And
in a later paragraph of the Mysterium
Coniunctionis he writes[9]:
“Before the time of Paracelsus the
alchemists believed in creatio
ex nihilo. For them therefore, God himself was the principle
of matter. But Paracelsus
and his school assumed that matter was an ‘increatum,’ and
hence coexistent and coeternal with God. Whether they considered this view monistic or
dualistic I am unable to discover. The only certain thing is
that for all the alchemists matter had a divine aspect, whether
on the ground that God was imprisoned in it in the form of the anima
mundi or anima media
natura, or matter represented God’s ‘reality’. In no
case was matter de-deified, and certainly not the potential
matter of the first day of creation. It seems that only the
Paracelsists were influenced by the dualistic words of the
Genesis.” [emphasis mine]
We see here that for Paracelsus and his
school, i.e., the alchemists Robert Fludd and Gerardus Dorneus
we are especially interested in here, in fact “nothing was [harder] than to
identify this anima mundi with
the Biblical imago Dei”.
As I have shown in The Return
of the World Soul[10]
it was Wolfgang
Pauli who first saw that Medieval alchemy was split in two very
different branches, the Neoplatonic and the Hermetic.
Neoplatonic alchemy mostly practiced by priests, did in fact
identify the world soul with the Christian God. However, the
Paracelsists, i.e., the Hermetic branch of alchemy usually
practiced by physicians, accepted the threefold world soul as a
counter principle to God. This
“lower Trinity” (W. Pauli) they called Sulphur, Sal and
Mercury[11].
The conclusion we can draw is that Carl
Jung mixes up these two different alchemical schools and
therefore creates confusion. He oscillates unconsciously between
these two completely different God-images of alchemy, the
Neoplatonic and the Hermetic. Therefore, since only in
Neoplatonic alchemy the Anthropos and thus the anima mundi is identical with God, in Hermetic alchemy however a
principle of universal animation of nature, the depth
psychologist cannot help himself other than to arrange her
relocation from Heaven to the intermediate realm.
Thus, in § 748 of the Mysterium
Coniunctionis he proceeds on as follows[12]:
“For the early thinkers the soul was by
no means a merely intellectual concept; it was visualized
sensuously as a breath-body or a volatile but physical substance which, it was
readily supposed, could be chemically extracted and ‘fixed’
by means of a suitable procedure.” [emphasis mine]
The breath-body, the volatile but physical
substance, the subtle body, is the microcosmic aspect of the
world soul, “imprinted on all bodies.” Its creation is only
possible out of the intermediate realm, the first goal of the unio
corporalis. It is Robert Fludd’s subtle realm between
Heaven and earth, out of which the second birth happens, the
birth of the infans solaris. It is the womb of the goddess the old, sick and
dying king has to enter for his regeneration. It is the earth in
which the seeds created out of the atoms of the dissolving and
drowning king are buried for the goal of the creation of new
vegetative life. It is the intermediate realm symbolized by the
Seal of Solomon, the first goal of Gerardus Dorneus’ unio
corporalis out of which, in a second birth, the quintessence
and the red tincture are extracted.
When
Carl Jung continues[13]
“This intention [the extraction of the
breath-body] was served by the preparation of the phlegma vini. As I pointed out earlier, this was not the spirit and
water of the wine but its solid residue, the chthonic and
corporeal part which would not
ordinarily be regarded as the essential and valuable thing about the wine.”
[emphasis mine]
We
can therefore conclude that the phlegma
vini is a symbol of the prima
materia and of the lapis[14], the threefold counter principle to the Christian God, and the
transformation of the materia
prima into the philosophical gold or lapis
takes place in the second coniunctio,
the unio corporalis.
The “not regarded as the essential and valuable thing”, the phlegma vini, the alchemical “earth” should be combined with the
“water,” and thus the symbolical equivalent of the Rosarium’s dew, the matter-psyche in my terminology should be
created. Out of the drowning body of the dying king, of the dead
atoms of his inanimate body, the seeds for the new life in the
intermediate realm between Heaven and earth are produced. In
stercore invenitur…!
Further
we realize now that it is not the caelum,
the blue Heaven, the spiritual essence that is produced out of
the first birth of the unio
corporalis, the Seal of Solomon, but that this second birth,
the red tincture, will have the same consistency as the
intermediate realm, i.e., its subtilty. On the microcosmic level
it is therefore the subtle body, the body soul, which is created,
and on the macrocosmic the world soul, the matter-psyche.
We
recognize now also why Carl Jung equates in a regressive way the
unio corporalis with
the unio mentalis: The
depth psychologist is not yet conscious about the fact that the
energy term must be bipolar, and therefore he cannot distinguish
between Neoplatonic and Hermetic alchemy, the former stamped by
the spirit-psyche, the latter by the bipolarity of the energy
term. He identifies more or less with Neoplatonic alchemy, and
thus for him there exists only what I call the spirit-psyche, be
it on the conscious level as the Logos ego, be it on the
intermediate level between the ego and the Self as the Anima,
the feminine spirit-psyche, be it on the collective level of the
Self, the collective spirit-psyche.
Because
of the archetypal necessity of the bipolarity of the energy term,
and since Carl Jung’s Self contains only the collective
spirit-psyche, we obtain further the remarkable result that the
second part of the energy term, the matter-psyche, the
energetical principle of the subtle body and of the world soul,
becomes the shadow of the Self, the collective shadow of the Logos, or
what I call the
Eros Self.
The
Eros Self is symbolized by the queen or the goddess, the regent
of the intermediate realm, of the king’s grave, of the uterus
in which the old, sick and dying king has to enter for his
regeneration, rejuvenation and reincarnation. It is this realm
of the Eros out of which the new king, the new life will be born
in the near future.
[proofread
GJS, 11/20/05]
part
13
Very often the prima
materia and the lapis
of alchemy are identical. This is the case since these
early nature philosophers were not yet able to distinguish
the gross aspect of matter from the subtle aspect, the
matter-psyche. Tantrism knows this distinction as the
concept of sthula
and suksma. See The Wheel Image of Nicholas von Flue as Symbol of the Subtle Body, http://www.psychovision.ch/rfr/radbilde.htm#5